A-Z Linux Guide
A to Z Linux Guide, RedHat, Fedora, Ubuntu, FreeBSD, Debian Guides and UpdatesIs LinuxMint better than Ubuntu?
Posted March 15th, 2007 in NewsI received an interesting email the other day that I wanted to share with you:
Hi, Matt
Here’s another tip-of-the-cap for LinuxMint, as compared to my Ubuntu distro.
I went to Yahoo to check one of my mailboxes, and there was an interesting video being shown on the opening Yahoo page. Well, after adding several ‘flash’ components to my Ubuntu distro, I still couldn’t show the video, and Yahoo complained that several things needed to be upgraded, etc., before it would even offer to play. I switched over to my LinuxMint box, went to Yahoo and the video played. My point? LinuxMint just worked, when, after several minutes of futzing, etc., Ubuntu still didn’t.
Linux is not ready on the desktop
Posted March 9th, 2007 in NewsI have a little esoteric set of screen attached to my Linux Workstation. That’s three 20″ LCD screen which are all pivoted (rotated 90 degrees incase you’re not familiar with this word). Now I need to use the nvidia binary only kernel package with this computer, because nothing else would work. I know, since I’ve tried Matrox cards, and they didn’t cut it, and you can’t use two ATI cards in the same linux machine with either the xorg ati driver or the binary only fglrx driver. There didn’t seem to be any problem with the nvidia driver at all for the longest time. Then one day when I came home, the machine had halted, I rebooted, an thought it’s probably nothing, but this started to happen more frequently, and now we are at the point where it will stay up for a few hours and then livelock the computer. The xorg nv driver doesn’t work for all the screens in the setup, but it doesn’t crash or anything, so I tend to think this is a driver releated bug. And the thing is, I’m giving up this computer as a windows workstation in the very near future, so I don’t want to waste time trying to fix things.
Having a fresh Ubuntu Edgy Eft installation on a moderately or very powerfull PC makes up for a pretty complete and comprehensive machine. The problems begin when you have some other rather unusual setup to run, like for example my 3 monitor system. I really hope the driver doesn’t regress when I start using it in the near future, once the good people at verkkokauppa.com deliver my machine and parts.
Ok, these are the moments for which I have a tv. The classic movie Sneakers just came on mtv3. I missed the first 45 minutes of the film, because I wasn’t aware that it was airing. ![]()
Huge Linux Desktop Deals for Hewlett-Packard
Posted March 9th, 2007 in NewsHewlett-Packard is closing custom deals for thousands of desktop PCs running Linux, which has the company assessing the possibility of offering factory-loaded Linux systems, an HP executive said.
“We are involved in a number of massive deals for Linux desktops, and those are the kinds of things that are indicators of critical mass. So we are really looking at it very hard,” said Doug Small, worldwide director of open source and Linux marketing at HP. “We are in a massive deal right now for … multi-thousands of units of a desktop opportunity for Linux. That’s an indicator.” He declined to give details about the Linux deals.
Though HP doesn’t offer a specific SKU of a notebook or desktop PC preloaded with Linux, several of its notebooks are certified to work with Novell’s SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 operating system and with Red Hat Linux. The Palo Alto, Calif., IT giant also provides Linux-loaded PCs for custom orders, such as large enterprise deals.
30 Days with Ubuntu Linux
Posted March 9th, 2007 in News
Many people, daunted by Vista’s hardware requirements and product activation issues, claim on various boards how they plan to “switch to Linux.” We spend 30 days using nothing but Ubuntu Linux to find out if this is truly a viable alternative for the consumer.
Introduction
Complaining about Windows Vista is a national past time on Internet forums these days. Windows Vista “costs too much,” “has onerous product activation,” “requires too much hardware,” etc. These complaints are often followed up by a very simple boast: “I’m just going to switch to Linux (or Mac).”
But in today’s landscape, how viable is that statment? Is the threat to switch to Linux an empty one, or is it entirely possible? Linux on the desktop has been viable for years, especially for programming gurus who can solve their Linux problems by simply writing new software. It also seems to be viable for “Mom and Pop” end-users who just want a machine to write letters, send email, and browse the Web (although, admittedly, a guru will probably have to set it up for them).
But what about power users, such as the typical audience of HardOCP - those who know how to build their own computers, but not compile their own programs? Or people who may not know how to do something, but aren’t afraid of taking the time to figure it out? Is Linux truly an alternative? Can they do everything they did in Windows? The truth is, we didn’t know, but we very much wanted to find out.
To properly explore these issues, we took a cue from Morgan Spurlock and made the decision to use Ubuntu Linux as our home operating system for 30 days.
Fedora and Ubuntu, better performance?
Posted March 7th, 2007 in NewsWe have compared the 32-bit and 64-bit performance of Ubuntu and started a performance comparison of Ubuntu/Kubuntu/Xubuntu, but how does the performance of the upcoming Feisty Fawn release compare to that of Fedora 7? In this article we have enclosed benchmarks from Fedora Core 6, Ubuntu 6.10 Edgy Eft, Fedora 7 Test 2, and Ubuntu Feisty Fawn Herd 5. In gaming and desktop benchmarks, which of these Linux distributions is faster? We hope to answer that question today.
It is important to note that testing/development releases of both Ubuntu and Fedora are slower than their final versions, which is partially why we had went back to also include benchmarks from Edgy Eft 6.10 and Zod. Both Fedora Core 6 (Zod) and Ubuntu 6.10 (Edgy Eft) were released this past October, while Ubuntu 7.04 (Feisty Fawn) will be introduced this April and Fedora 7 this May. Originally Fedora 7 was slated for release around the same time as Feisty Fawn, but a delay in the feature freeze has postponed the release by a month.
For comparing these two versions of two distributions the Linux benchmarks used were Enemy Territory, Timed Disk Reads, Gzip Compression, LAME compilation, and LAME encoding. Below is the hardware selection used in these benchmarks as well as the stock package 32-bit versions in both Fedora 6/7 and Ubuntu 6.10/7.04. On the following pages are our results.
Is it important to have an AntiVirus for Linux?
Posted March 7th, 2007 in NewsThe problem with answering this question is that those asking it know only OSes where viruses, trojan-horse programs, worms, nasty Javascripts, ActiveX controls with destructive payloads, and ordinary misbehaved applications are a constant threat to their computing. Therefore, they refuse to believe Linux could be different, no matter what they hear.And yet it is.
Here’s the short version of the answer: No. If you simply never run untrusted executables while logged in as the root user (or equivalent), all the “virus checkers” in the world will be at best superfluous; at worst, downright harmful. “Hostile” executables (including viruses) are almost unfindable in the Linux world — and no real threat to it — because they lack root-user authority, and because Linux admins are seldom stupid enough to run untrusted executables as root, and because Linux users’ sources for privileged executables enjoy paranoid-grade scrutiny (such that any unauthorised changes would be detected and remedied).
Here’s the long version: Still no. Any program on a Linux box, viruses included, can only do what the user who ran it can do. Real users aren’t allowed to hurt the system (only the root user can), so neither can programs they run.
Because of the distinction between privileged (root-run) processes and user-owned processes, a “hostile” executable that a non-root user receives (or creates) and then executes (runs) cannot “infect” or otherwise manipulate the system as a whole. Just as you can delete only your own files (i.e., those you have “write” permission to), executables you run cannot affect other users’ (or root’s) files. Therefore, although you can create (or retrieve), and then run, a virus, worm, trojan horse, etc., it can’t do much. Unless you do so as “root”. Which it’s simple to avoid doing.
Top Linux Distro: Ubuntu tops the forum members
Posted March 7th, 2007 in News
The top 10 linux distributions based on the number of its registered members are the following:
1. Ubuntu = 250,190 members
2. Gentoo = 105,828 members
3. Fedora = 89,088 members
4. Mandriva = 41,868 members
5. Xandros = 25,185 members
6. OpenSuse = 17,607 members
7. Kubuntu = 16,106 members
8. Freespire = 11,732 members
9. Arch Linux = 8,290 members
10. PCLinuxOS = 6,344 members
Read Detailed report here
The Linux desktop is a complete blast (Katie McAuliff, Novell Canada)
Posted March 7th, 2007 in News
In January, Chicago native Katie McAuliff, who has worked for Novell Inc. for 13 years, took over as president of Novell Canada, replacing Don Chapman. Ms McAuliff will oversee all facets of the Canadian organization including sales, marketing, consulting, support, training, finance and operations, with a focus on expanding and strengthening Novell Canada’s partnership model.She sat down with Jack Kapica of Globetechnology.com to explain her company and its plans.
JACK KAPICA: Novell has been shifting its image recently. What markets is the company focussing on?
KATIE McAULIFF: A lot of people don’t really know who we are and what we do today. We’re in five markets — data centre, desktop, security and identity management, resource management and workgroups. Novell is firmly behind all these markets.
The Linux desktop is a complete blast. This market just went to a million downloads. It’s hot, it’s cool, it’s a lot less expensive, the kids are loving it. School systems have some great desktop operating systems — it’s also in kiosks, retail systems, point-of-sale systems. A lot of those systems are being refreshed now, so the best thing now is really lowering the cost of ownership, increasing return on investment. This is a great space, very strong selling. We’re 95 per cent there as a viable alternative to anything else.
These are huge growth markets for us, enjoying double-digit growth.
A lot of people don’t even realize that Linux runs on a mainframe, and that we do a lot of business on mainframes with Linux partitions. My sense here is that the potential has not yet been realized in the Canadian market.
Read the complete conversation here
Linux Truth and Myths (Migration from Windows and Mac)
Posted March 6th, 2007 in NewsWritten by Steve Wild
Published March 05, 2007
Published at: http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/03/05/161203.php
When people find out I run Linux on my computer instead of Windows or even Mac OS X they sometimes have funny ideas about what it must be like. Some of it is historical; Linux used to be quite difficult to administer in its younger days. Some of it is misinformation, or no information at all. I hope to dispell some of the misconceptions.
Linux is difficult to install - Myth. For the most part. Depending on the distribution, Linux is much faster and easier to install than Windows is. A smooth install of Linux takes me about an hour including installing updates, and even less sometimes. This includes installs of Red Hat (before it was Red Hat Enterprise Linux), Fedora (after it was Red Hat), Mandrake (now Mandriva), and Ubuntu (still Ubuntu). Of course, there are some distributions aimed at more experienced users that seem to go out of their way to make the whole installation process a little more, shall we say, complex. I’m looking at you, Gentoo.
I just recently re-installed Windows on a friend’s computer that had become so infected with god-knows-what that it was completely unusable. I didn’t keep track of how long the install took, but it was hours and hours, not even including when I had to go to bed and continue the install in the morning. Downloading and installing updates, rebooting, downloading and installing more updates, rebooting again. On and on it went.
Of course, after the install all he had was Windows with some minor applications like Notepad and Wordpad, and some games like Solitaire and Minesweeper. Don’t get me wrong, I’ve wasted plenty of time on both of those, but it’s a pretty sparse selection.
When I install a Linux distro I get a complete, usable desktop. An office suite, CD and DVD burning software, image manipulation software, full featured email suites, and lots of games. All for no cost. And lots more easily available. Which brings me to my next point…
Truth about switching to Ubuntu Linux
Posted March 5th, 2007 in News01. People will ridicule you for using Ubuntu
I have been sat at work and had people actually laugh out loud at my laptop running Ubuntu. I’ve had people pick up the free professionally-made official Ubuntu CDs, sneer and throw them back at me. Once people try it out though, they often change their opinion. Even if they don’t use it daily, their respect for Ubuntu goes up after at least trying it.
02……..
© 2012 A-Z Linux Guide Powered by WordPress | Login
